One day i was working and this tweet got pushed to my phone:
Formal tracking seems to help more than informal “in your head” tracking. Why do you think this is the case? quantifiedself.com/2013/01/pew-in…
— quantifiedself (@quantifiedself) January 28, 2013
and as always i do have an opinion no it. And the internet needed to know about it, so here it is:
I think that one of the main reasons informal tracking fails is that it’s purpose is not to improve (or at least the stated purpose is to improve in the long term which for all intents and purposes is kind of doomed) but to make you feel good: Did i do my job today ?.
By design this will make you remember only the things which make you feel good and conveniently forget things that didn’t go well. Which actually rubs you of one of the few good lever one can use to improve itself: the knowledge of what went wrong and the ability to dig into why they went wrong.
Formal tracking is better in this respect because it allows you to mentally separate the collection process from the pain of analyzing the data. That way if and when you are ready to look critically at what went didn’t went well you do have the data available and you can dig into it, find out what might not be going well and improve yourself.
Mihai